Our concept of time has been fundamentally shaped by the natural
rhythms of Earth's interactions with the Sun and the Moon: the day, the
month and the year. These are the natural units of time. All others -
the second, minute, hour, week, quarter, decade, century, and millennium
- are derived from these three. As the cultures of the world have
become more integrated, a common system of timekeeping has been
universally adopted for civil purposes. The 24-hour clock, with its
further divisions into 60 minutes per hour and 60 seconds per minute, is
used exclusively throughout the world. The Gregorian calendar has
become the international standard for civil time, although a number of
other calendars - such as the Julian, Chinese, Jewish, Islamic, and
Hindu calendars - continue to be used for cultural and religious
purposes.
So why Martian time? Since we have a standard for civil time on
Earth, why not export it to Mars in order to maintain commonality? This
straightforward idea overlooks the fact that the time standard we have
adopted on Earth works for everyone only because we all live on Earth
and are subject to all of the same natural cycles. The problem is that
Mars has its own distinct natural cycles, and the impact of these cycles
on human activities on Mars will be impossible to ignore. Our daily
routine will be synchronized with the Martian day, not the Earth day,
and it will be the annual passing of the Martian seasons, not those of
Earth, that will have a significant effect on our activities.
How long is a day on Mars? Just about any astronomy book will tell
you that the rotational period of Mars is 24.6229 hours, or 24 hours, 37
minutes. However, note that the same table also gives Earth's
rotational period as 23 hours 56 minutes. But isn't Earth's day 24 hours
long? What happened to the missing four minutes? The difference is that
the 23 hours 56 minute figure is a sidereal day, i.e., Earth's rotation
as measured from the point of view of a fixed reference angle. But as
Earth turns once on its axis, it also moves along its orbit around the
sun, and the direction from the Earth to the sun changes slightly. It
takes Earth an extra four minutes to rotate through this additional
angle, and so Earth's solar day, measured from the point of view of the
sun, is 24 hours. The same principle applies to Mars. Although its
sidereal day is 24 hours, 37 minutes, its solar day is 24 hours, 39
minutes, 35.244 seconds (88775.244 seconds).
Humans have already experienced the need to work according to a
Martian daily schedule at times during the past quarter century. During
the Viking missions in the 1970s, operations teams had to schedule tasks
for the two landers based on the daylight hours at the two sites. A new
term - sol - was coined for the Martian solar day. The sol on
which each lander touched down was designated "Sol 0," and each
successive sol was numbered consecutively. In order to express the local
time at each site, the sol was divided into 24 Martian hours, which
were in turn divided into 60 minutes per hour and 60 seconds per minute,
just as on Earth. This same system was later used during the Mars
Pathfinder mission in 1997. Exactly who developed this system? We wish
we knew, for we would certainly like for him or her to be recognized.
Notice that the system of time used during the Viking surface operations, and which was later adopted for the Mars Pathfinder mission, made use of only one natural Martian cycle: the solar day. What about the Martian year? Viking Lander 2 operated for 1,280 sols (nearly two Martian years), and Viking Lander 1 lasted even longer - 2,244 sols, or more than three Martian years.
How long is a year on Mars? Just about any astronomy book will tell
you that the orbital period of Mars is a bit less than 687 days. But
this measurement is in 24-hour Earth days, not Martian sols, which are
almost forty minutes longer. If you lived on Mars, you would count
668.5906 sols from one vernal equinox to the next.
On Earth, the vernal equinox (the beginning of spring) is used to
define the beginning of the astronomical year. This occurs when the Sun
is directly above the Earth's equator, and the daylight and night
periods are exactly 12 hours each (the term equinox is derived
from two Latin words and translates literally as "equal night"). In
organizing data for Martian phenomena that are influenced by the annual
cycle, scientists often use the Martian vernal equinox as the starting
point of the Martian year. Data is then graphed on a time scale from 0
to 668.6 sols.
The question then arises, how does one refer to one specific Martian
year versus another? How do we organize our description of annual
phenomena? For the Viking era, this was easy. One could refer to Sol 207
of Viking Year 1, for instance, and compare conditions at a landing
site then with the phenomena observed on Sol 207 of Viking Year 3,
exactly two Martian years later. But the situation becomes more
complicated when one wishes to compare data across two or more Mars
missions. A researcher interested in global weather patterns might want
to compare data from several orbiter missions obtained during a number
of different Martian years. For instance, suppose one needed to refer to
a data point on Sol 475 of the second Martian year of Viking Orbiter 1
operations and compare that to a data point on Sol 475 of first Martian
year of Mars Global Surveyor operations. This is a rather cumbersome
way of expressing what are essentially two Martian dates. To simplify
expressing Martian dates, we need to agree on a standard epoch, that is,
a starting date from which we all agree to count Martian years.
So far, we have discussed some of the technical requirements for
measuring time on Mars. That is a quite narrow perspective, and what we
currently have on Mars is a fairly rudimentary time system that serves
the needs of a specific community of space scientists. Even so, one can
see that as more spacecraft are sent to Mars and as more data
accumulates, the need for a more comprehensive Martian timekeeping
system grows.
Let us fast-forward to a time in which there is a human society on
Mars, with people from all conceivable walks of life, not just
scientists, engineers, and technicians, but accountants, artists, and
athletes. What sort of timekeeping system will these Martians need? In
asking that question, one needs to understand that developing a
timekeeping system to serve the broad spectrum of humanity and all of
its activities is really not a technical problem. The astronomy of
developing a clock and a calendar is relatively straightforward. Once
the space scientists determine the length of the sol and the Martian
year, their part of the job is pretty much done. Almost anyone can do
the math; it's only on the level of middle school algebra. However, the
true scope of the problem goes far beyond that, because developing a
comprehensive civil time system is mostly a human problem involving
social necessity. One needs to understand how human societies organize
themselves in the temporal dimension at various social levels. Also,
since each human society has done it differently, each of us has a
cultural bias when it comes to measuring time. Finally, since there is
no obvious best way to organize time for a society, arriving at a
universally accepted system of Martian timekeeping will involve
developing a consensus via a social process.
Such a process has been underway for several years now, primarily due
to the increased access to information and the increased ability to
form issue-oriented communities on the Internet. Years ago, from time to
time a person would consider the problem of Martian timekeeping and
publish a paper in some (often obscure) journal, usually ignorant of the
fact that others had published on the subject years before in some
other obscure journal or in a book that had a limited printing run.
Historically, the subject has not attracted wide attention. It may come
as a surprise to you that the roots of Martian timekeeping go far back
indeed. A couple of excellent Martian calendars were devised by
astronomers in the 1930s and 1950s, and one of these gentlemen went so
far as to have a working Martian clock built. Going back even further,
the subject of Martian time was discussed in a science fiction novel
published in 1880.
In the late 1990s, as the United States recommitted itself to a
sustained program of Mars exploration, and the Mars Society was founded
with the goal of furthering that exploration to eventually include human
missions, bases, and settlements, more people became interested in
Martian timekeeping. Nowadays, we find several new Martian timekeeping
websites every year. While in the old days, most writers thought they
were the first to look at the problem, that is becoming less and less
the case. Today, most people who get interested in the subject go online
and find at least some of the work that has already been published
before they finalize their own ideas. So now, rather than working in
isolation, there is an online discussion in progress. We are
increasingly being influenced by each other's ideas, and it is in this
environment that we can begin to form a consensus.
Consensus will probably develop in phases on an issue-by-issue basis.
Some issues may need to be settled in the near future (perhaps the need
for a standard epoch is one of these), while others can be deferred
indefinitely (the names of the days of the week or the months of the
year, for instance). Some issues may not need to be settled early, yet
it is possible that there may develop such an overwhelming preference
for specific solutions that consensus is achieved rapidly (the seven-day
week, for example).
Another factor that will determine how we arrive at a consensus is
the rise of various user communities, their specific needs for Martian
time, and their influence on each other. The space science community was
the first user community to emerge, but its requirements for Martian
time are fairly basic. This community will probably be incremental in
its approach to Martian time, adopting new standards only as the
technical need arises. At the other end of the scale are enthusiast
groups who look forward to a future human society thriving on Mars. For
some of these groups, a fully-developed timekeeping system, complete
with a calendar as well as a clock, is part of the characterization of
an emerging Martian cultural identity. These comprehensive time systems
may either be developed by the groups themselves or adopted from
previously published sources. In any case, these systems will compete
with each other by attracting either greater or fewer adherents over
time. Some of these enthusiast groups have developed websites and even
web-based Mars simulations that feature Martian timekeeping systems. One
can speculate that the relative success of the competing systems in the
environment of the World Wide Web will be a function of the popularity
of their associated websites and not necessarily of the merits of the
timekeeping systems themselves.
It may be useful to develop statistical tools to measure - and
perhaps even to guide - the development of a consensus. To that end, we
created the Martian Time Survey.
The survey is currently in its second version. The results of the first
version were reported at the Third International Convention of the Mars
Society (Gangale & Dudley-Rowley, 2000).
The survey records respondents' selection of options for specific
aspects of Martian timekeeping, such as the number of primary divisions
(hours) in a Martian solar day, or the choice of an epoch for counting
Martian years. Thus the individual ideas that have been proposed over
the years are deconstructed from their original comprehensive
timekeeping packages and the associated cachet of individual authors or
specific groups. Respondents can make selections on an issue-by-issue
basis according to the merits of the proposed options, rather than
choose between whole systems authored by a given person or touted by a
specific group. Additionally, in the current version of the survey,
respondents are encouraged to propose new options, and to furnish
background information on each issue as well as pro and con
arguments for each option as they desire. Thus not only can people
respond to the survey, they can also influence the evolution of the
survey.
Let's now turn to some specific issues.
Going back to the Viking project, the 24-60-60 system was not the
only possible choice for a Martian clock. A number of writers on the
subject of Martian time have considered clocks based on powers of ten.
Technically speaking, there's no reason not to use such a system, and in
fact the idea has a great deal of merit. The real issue is, once again,
human. The 24-60-60 clock is deeply ingrained in human culture. On
Earth, we agree to disagree on a number of other points when it comes to
time. We variously prefer Friday or Saturday or Sunday as our
sabbatical day, and we maintain a number of cultural calendars. But
everyone tells the time of day by hours, minutes and seconds! So it was
not unreasonable for the Viking program to stretch Earth's 24-60-60
clock to fit the longer Martian sol. In any case, the precedent for Mars
has been set, and metric clock advocates have their work cut out for
them.
More information on the topic The Martian Day: Structure
Given the number of cultural calendars that persist on Earth, despite
the Gregorian calendar being the agreed civil standard, you can imagine
the number of issues that we as a species bring to the problem of
developing a Martian calendar.
Some people want to keep the seven-day week, some favor other numbers, and some want to abolish the week entirely.
More information on the topic The Martian Week: Structure
It is very much the same with the month. Some want to retain the
12-month year, while some think this makes for awfully long months
(remember that the Martian year is nearly twice as long as Earth's) and
would rather have twice as many in order to keep them to about the same
number of days as Earthly months. Some want to keep the structure of the
year simple and have months that are nearly equal in duration. Others,
taking note of Mars' lopsided orbit, think that the months should span
equal arcs of that orbit, even though this means that each month would
contain a different number of sols (presenting a challenge Martian poets
to come up with a mnemonic poem that would be truly memorable, if not
very short). Then again, some want to abolish the month altogether.
More information on the topic The Martian Month: Structure
The season in which the calendar year should begin is another point
of contention. Some favor the vernal equinox, others the winter solstice
or another astronomically significant point, and still others still
have picked arbitrary points in Mars' orbit to serve as the first sol of
the year.
Picking a leap year system is far from simple either. The year lasts
about 668.6 sols, whereas the length of each calendar year must be a
whole number. There are leap year schemes that contain a pattern of
668-sol and 669-sol years. Other schemes include double leap years of
670 sols. Others ideas involve adding entire leap weeks or leap months.
Once one has decided on how many extra sols to have in leap years,
when should those extra sols occur: at the beginning of the year, at the
end of the year, or somewhere in between?
One idea for improving on the Gregorian calendar is to have each year
begin on the same day of the week (Sunday, for instance). A number of
ideas for reforming the Gregorian calendar that were proposed in the
19th and 20th centuries involved making it perpetual, that is, making
each common year and each leap year begin on a Sunday and end on a
Saturday. The fact is that the Gregorian calendar isn't really a single
calendar but rather a set of 14 different calendars. A common year can
begin on any of the seven days of the week, and so can a leap year. This
is why you have to throw out your old calendar at the end of each year
and buy a new one. Extending this idea of regularizing the calendar,
each month could begin on the same day of the week. This would have the
advantage of always placing the numbered day of the month on the same
day of the week (one would know that the 16th always falls on a Tuesday,
for example).
Assuming that we want to have a perpetual calendar on Mars, how do we
implement it? If we keep the seven-day week, we have to come up with
some deft manoeuver to get around the fact that neither 668 nor 669 are
divisible by seven. Some solutions add one or more sols that fall
outside the normal weekly rotation of seven sols, and these extra sols
are counted as holidays. Another idea is to have an occasional six-sol
week, eliminating a workday. Alternatively, one could have a number of
sols at the end of the year that either comprises an irregular week or
are outside the weekly rotation. Still another scheme is to have 665-sol
years (divisible by seven) and add a seven-sol leap week as necessary.
More information on the topic The Martian Year: Structure
Finally, as we touched on earlier, there is the question of
determining an epoch, a starting point for counting the Martian years.
Ideas range from dates thousands of years in the past (such as the
beginning of the Julian period), to much more recent events (such as the
landing of Mars 3 or Viking 1), to waiting for the first human landing (which of course makes it impossible to count Martian years in the meantime).
More information on the topic The Martian Epoch
These are just the structural issues of characterizing a complete
calendar system. We haven't even begun to discuss the problem of
nomenclature. Should all of these Martian units of time - the second,
minute, hour, week, month, and year - have new Martian names to
distinguish them from Terran time measurements? What should we name the
sols of the week and the months of the year? Such issues do not lend
themselves to logical arguments, but are rather a matter of personal
taste. This class of issues will probably be the last to be resolved.
Further information:
As you can see, there's far more to Martian timekeeping that we can
possibly cover in one short article. We invite you to visit the Martian Time website to learn more. Also, feel free to join the Martian Time Virtual Conference
and share your ideas. Finally, the crucible of all the ideas that have
been put forth is how they will be received by Martian society, and at
present, you, dear readers, are Martian society, and so we hope you will
take the time to register your preferences in the Martian Time Survey.
CopyrightA9 2002 by Thomas Gangale and Marilyn Dudley-Rowley.